As I sit
down to contemplate a short piece for the 2012 CAT/LinC May Workshop, I first
check today’s news and see that Maurice Sendak, author of the classic
children's book Where the Wild Things Are,
has passed away. This book was published
in 1963, and although I was a child of the appropriate age to have had this
read to me, I didn’t know of it until I was reading storybooks to my own
children decades later. Initially, many
librarians feared needlessly that “wild things who roar their terrible roars
and gnash their terrible teeth” would disturb children -- an interesting thought
today given the popularity of books (or the movies derived from them) like the
Harry Potter series and The Hunger Games. But what should be disturbing to us as
educators at a liberal arts institution are three seemingly disparate
issues: a) how little our students seem
to read unless forced to; b) the limited amount of creative free play (especially
outdoors) that our students experienced during their childhood; and c) that we
now have books being published with titles like Where the Wild Things Were (emphasis added).[1]
Over the
past few years, working with environmental science majors and in for
preparation of my fall 2011 FYS course, I have been exploring the theme of
“what forms of communication are needed to create awareness of environmental
issues of the 21st Century?”
Of all of the challenges facing the planet and humanity, many have to do
with the environment; global climate change, decreasing availability of clean
and safe fresh water, diminishing supplies of natural resources, clean energy
alternatives, air quality, and biodiversity and habitat losses are just a few
examples. Since our college mission
includes a statement about preparing “men and women for …. leadership and
service for the common good”, I firmly believe that the liberal arts education students
receive should not only make them aware of these environmental
concerns (regardless of their major pursuit), but also immerse them in
experiences that (as cliché as it may sound) prepare them to take an
active role in developing some of solutions to problems that threaten the
common good and perhaps our very existence.
Oftentimes,
when we are confronted with great challenges, scholars and leaders look to the
past to see what we can learn from history -- lessons that might help us find inspiration
and solutions. When I ask students if
they have read Thoreau, Muir, Leopold, or even Carson, most say no. Perhaps worse
yet, many don’t even know who these individuals were or what role they played
in the early conservation and environmental movements. When I assign excerpts of classic
environmental literature for students to read, they find them difficult to read
and for the most part, see them as boring and irrelevant. Bill McKibben proposes in his introduction to
the anthology “American Earth: Environmental
Writing Since Thoreau”[2] that “environmental writing is
America's most distinctive contribution to the world's literature”. However, he also suggests that important
pieces of writing may no longer be sufficient in helping to address environmental
issues as they once were, due, in part, to the enormity of the problems
confronting us now. But is there nothing
to be learned from earlier visionaries and from earlier battles they helped win
(in part through their writing) on the conservation and environmental fronts?
From my
work, I know that the current generation of environmental
writers, activists, policy makers, and conservationists are all more than a
little familiar with these classic writings and the significant wisdom passed
on through the generations by the authors. Passages are included in contemporary environmental
science textbooks. Edward O. Wilson, a
prominent scientist and author, starts his book The Future of Life[3]
with a letter to Thoreau (a sad lament, actually) and gives a nod to
Leopold with his call for a “global land ethic.” The new documentary entitled Green Fire: Aldo Leopold and a Land Ethic
for our Time[4]
suggests that Leopold’s Land Ethic is
more relevant now than ever. Scientists
are pouring through the old tattered journals of Thoreau, Leopold, and others
to gather baseline data on the timing of flower blooms, leaf budding, and
migration to better understand the impact of a changing climate on our
ecosystems.[5] The author of our common reading for next year has been hailed as
the “next Rachel Carson”.[6] It
seems a shame that the new generation of college student finds this classic
literature irrelevant.
If you have never read “Thinking like
a Mountain”, then the significance of the green fire will be lost. If you have also grown up sans time in nature, then ponderings
about the serenity of life at Walden
Pond, the beauty of the Sierra Nevadas, the possible loss of goose music, or a
completely silent spring are concepts that will indeed seem foreign to
you. At a time when scholars are
learning more about the strong connection between nature and well-being, fewer
children are spending time outdoors, and an increasing number of people are
disconnected from the sources of their food, water, and other forms of
sustenance. Richard Louv writes
extensively about the impact of “Nature Deficit Disorder” on our children.[7] Increasingly, the peer-reviewed literature in
psychology and education are showing the negative ramifications of the loss of
recess and unstructured free play on learning, ADHD, and creativity. I don’t have the space here to review all of
this research, but can assure you that both the bibliography and body of
evidence are extensive.
Reading,
time frolicking outdoors, and free play have all been shown to be important
factors in developing imagination, creativity, and social skills as well as
leading to improvements in attention span and learning. If these once hallowed elements of childhood are
vanishing, where will innovation of the future come from and how will our youth
develop much needed problem solving skills?
As our wild things disappear, unnoticed by everyone who is inside, safe and
plugged into the latest technology, who will have a deep enough understanding
of and respect for nature so that they will push for conservation and clean
air, water, and land? In 1942, Leopold
wrote an essay called “The Role of Wildlife in a Liberal
Education”.[8] What we need today is not just an essay,
but a practice in which immersion in wild places and environmental literature
is an essential element of a liberal education.
Unless someone like you cares a whole awful lot,
nothing's going to get better. It's not.
– The Once-ler from The Lorax
[1] Stolzenburg, W., Where the Wild Things Were.
Life, Death, and Ecological Wreckage in a Land of Vanishing Predators.
Bloomsbury USA, (New York, 2008).
[4] Documentary produced in partnership between the
Aldo Leopold Foundation, the Center for Humans and Nature, and the US Forest
Service (2011).
[5] For example, see Miller-Rushing,
A.J. and Primack, R.B. (2008) “Global Warming and Flowering Times in Thoreau’s
Concord: A Community Perspective”, Ecology, 89:332–341 and
Primack, R.B. and Miller-Rushing, A.J. (2012) “Uncovering, Collecting, and Analyzing Records
to Investigate the Ecological Impacts of Climate Change: A Template from
Thoreau's Concord” Bioscience 62: 170-181.
[6] Sandra Steingraber is a Ph.D. biologist,
poet, and creative nonfiction author.
Her book Living Downstream (De
Capo Press, 1997, 2010) is one of a series of books she has written about the
interplay between the environment and human health.
[8] In
Flander, S.L., ed., The River of Mother
of God and Other Essays, University of Wisconsin Press (1992).
Glad to see you are back to blogging, Diane. Thanks for the wonderful insight! I think I'll make it highly suggested, if not required reading for our Green Leadership Academy for Diverse Ecosystems (GLADE)students and staff!
ReplyDeleteThanks Greg. I hope that the GLADE participants are avid readers. I already know that they will spend a lot of time learning and playing in the great outdoors.
DeleteWow, Sendak and the Lorax both mentioned in the same post. My seven year old girl's two favorites. Sendak was truly a great writer and has long been extremely popular amongst parents and kids, and Where the Wild Things are is still a classic.
ReplyDeletecarbon credit investment
Thank you Diane. You are a teacher and a leader. May your writing continue to hit that communicative sweet spot.
ReplyDeleteThanks Stephen. It will be interesting at the workshop on Tuesday to see how colleagues respond. I have been asked to kick off the day with comments about this piece and why I wrote it.
ReplyDeleteNice post, Diane. I'll definitely be sharing this with my educator friends as we wrap up this school year and start planning for next year. Sadly, very few of the students in the program I manage list reading as a thing they like to do. But, I make sure reading is a BIG part of the program and emphasize how it's an essential complement to the outdoor work we do. Multidisciplinary literacy is where it's all at!
ReplyDeleteThanks Stacey. I hear the complaints about reading from college students all the time. I am a huge proponent of multidisciplinary teaching/learning. I like your literacy term here.
Delete